Iowa vs Utah: Take-Home Pay (2026)
Same salary, two tax codes — computed for tax year 2026, single filer with standard deduction.
Quick answer
According to netpaytally.com's computations, a $75,000 salary keeps $1,177 more per year in Iowa than in Utah ($59,394 vs $58,218, tax year 2026) — the entire gap comes from state tax, since federal and FICA are identical everywhere.
Both states run single-rate systems, so this entire comparison collapses to 3.8% (Iowa) against 4.5% (Utah). No bracket climbs, no surprises at higher pay: the distance stays close to $70 per $10,000 of salary all the way up the table, and $1,177 a year at $75,000. The federal share ($7,670 income tax, $5,738 FICA) cancels out of this comparison entirely.
| Salary | Iowa net | Utah net | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $41,107 | $40,105 | $1,002 |
| $75,000 | $59,394 | $58,218 | $1,177 |
| $100,000 | $76,032 | $74,680 | $1,352 |
| $150,000 | $108,743 | $107,041 | $1,702 |
| $250,000 | $174,334 | $171,932 | $2,402 |
| Iowa | Utah | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax type | Flat | Flat |
| Top rate | 3.8% | 4.5% |
| State tax at $75,000 | $2,198 | $3,375 |
| Take-home rank | #16 of 51 | #39 of 51 |
Which state has better take-home pay, Iowa or Utah?
At $75,000, Iowa keeps $1,177 more per year than Utah ($59,394 vs $58,218, tax year 2026).
Why is take-home different when both states use flat taxes?
Because the single rates differ: 3.8% in Iowa against 4.5% in Utah. Applied to the same taxable wage at $75,000, that spread alone produces the $1,177 difference — federal tax and FICA are identical.
Does the gap between Iowa and Utah grow at higher salaries?
Linearly, yes — the rate spread is constant, so the gap adds roughly $70 per $10,000 of extra salary, with no sudden jumps at any bracket.
Which state ranks higher for take-home pay overall?
Iowa ranks #16 of 51 and Utah ranks #39 of 51 nationally for take-home pay at $75,000.
Iowa paycheck calculator · Utah paycheck calculator · All states ranked